Many beautiful walking paths and trails make the farm a great destination for your next outdoor outing.Ĭlearview Farm is a visually stunning destination and has different crops in bloom at various times throughout the growing season. What is there to see/do at Clearview Farm?Ĭlearview Farm offers 18 unique crops to explore. Commercial and academic partnerships to strengthen and enrich our local economyĢ.Abundant testing ground for non-native crops.Field trips, demonstrations, and internships for students.A visually stunning, photo-ready destination during all four seasons.Here are a few ways Clearview Farm enhances the C-U community: Each crop has educational signage, and we provide a variety of activities, events, and programs for the community to participate in each year.Īt Clearview Farm, people of all ages are invited to enjoy beautiful surroundings and educational opportunities.
Our goal is to display regenerative agriculture practices as a concept, collect data and results, and learn about what ideas might prove successful for Illinois farms.Ĭlearview Farm is also a space for the community to visit, explore, experience, and learn about agriculture. We grow a variety of unique crops utilizing regenerative agriculture practices including implementing crop diversity, no-till, constant cover, and more. The focus of Clearview Farm is regenerative agriculture and community engagement. N.Y.Clearview Farm is where the heartland’s history meets farming’s future. v Community Blue, HMO of Blue Cross of W. Such action is not warranted inasmuch as we conclude that plaintiff's appeal does not constitute "frivolous conduct" as defined in 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) (see Amherst Magnetic Imaging Assoc. We decline to impose sanctions or to award attorney's fees, costs, or disbursements to defendants, as defendants request in their brief. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for leave to reargue (see Hill v Milan, 89 AD3d 1458, 1458 Empire Ins. v Pleasantville Cottage School, 302 AD2d 259, 260). Although plaintiff denominated the motion as one to "modify" the court's order, we conclude from the papers submitted in support of the motion that it was, in effect, a motion for leave to reargue the denial of prejudgment interest, which the court denied (see Matter of Hoover v Derry, 3 AD3d 659, 659 C.R. Plaintiff did not appeal that order and instead filed a motion to "modify" the court's order to include prejudgment interest. After a bench trial, Supreme Court reached a verdict in favor of plaintiff and thereafter issued an order awarding plaintiff $1,676.66 for unpaid rent and utilities, without prejudgment interest, and $150 for attorney's fees.
Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for defendants' breach of their residential lease agreement with plaintiff. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. FEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. DICK, ROCHESTER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion to modify an order dated November 19, 2013.ĪNDREW J. PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.ĬLEARVIEW FARMS LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,ĭAVID PAPKE AND MICHELLE OLDS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.Īppeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Thomas A. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Īppellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
0 kommentar(er)
